I looked at Evening Open yesterday and got once again a reason to think about love, relationship no

I looked at Evening Open yesterday and got once again a reason to think about love, relationship norms, togetherness, more activities and other things that belong to the same subject. There was talk about the golfer Tiger Woods is said to have been unfaithful to his wife as hen has two children with. On this basis were the people in the studio to talk about sex, togetherness and feminine / masculine. Who is the victim and who think it's the most exciting thing about sex? Carl Jan Granqvist surprised me by expressing themselves somewhat anarchic relationship or at least non-reserved normative. Hen said that all relationships are unique and that a love relationship is not damaged by the existence of love elsewhere. That's how I see it! I tend to think that the relationship is so unique that it is impossible to divide them all under the label "friend", "partner", "fuck buddy" and so on. There are far too few categories, and people are not so simple that it is possible to draw clear lines showing where something ends and something else begins. At least not when it comes to relationships and feelings. I solve this by calling all who are close to me for "friends." It is perhaps a little cultipacker for sale non-relational anarchic to distinguish the "familiar," "Friends" and "Friends" but it's the solution that works for me. I'm not arguing that the whole community should be relationship anarchist, unlike nykterism and veganism * it's not something I want to spread (or it would of course easier to be understood, or flirting, if all were related anarchists). I think that everyone cultipacker for sale works differently and therefore need different types of relationships. The problem is that monogamy is the norm and that most do not even think about whether they want to be two-same, the same, or more "alone". So when you stand there one day and love to live with your partner but feel the tingle in your stomach when you're with someone else and you feel like a cheater. I think it is easier to be a relationship anarchist than to be mono. I do not think "I'm dating Zim so I should not overwhelm KYF with compliments about how I lose my breath as hen step into a room," or "Now hug, I was probably cultipacker for sale a bit too long and a little too intensely Pur" or "Wait oh, now I might fall in love with this person and we hang out often giant and blabla, cultipacker for sale we should be together then, or ...? ". cultipacker for sale I just need to think "Do I want to hug Pur? Yes. Pur seems like hugging with me, so we continue!". It is not without problems and I am not exempt from feelings of jealousy, insecurity, etc. but it is easier and freer. I think jealousy is linked to a fear of being forgotten, getting less love than a wish, and it can happen to you too as mono, poly or RA. I do not believe that polyamory saves you from jealousy - or more such causes. Mikusagi. * No I'm cultipacker for sale not vegan but ... I should be there. PS. I had a little dearth of ideas when it came header so I took a random read other bloggers' opinions on Evening Open, polyamory, monoamori, relationship anarchism, relationship standards, norms, relationships, love, jealousy, friendship, feelings
Visits: Visits this month: Number of visitors currently online: Add this blog to your list of favorite blogs on nyligen.se!
The pink store in November 2014 (2) October 2014 (1) September 2014 (3) August 2014 (2) July 2014 (2) June 2014 (4) May 2014 (4) April 2014 (2) March 2014 (2) February 2014 (4) January 2014 (6) December 2013 (3) November 2013 (2) October 2013 (4) August 2013 (11) July 2013 (6) June 2013 (4) May 2013 (the 5) in April 2013 (5) March 2013 (3) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (4) December 2012 (3) November 2012 (4) October 2012 (3) September 2012 (4) August 2012 (6) July 2012 (4) June 2012 (7) May 2012 (2) April 2012 (4) March 2012 (12) February 2012 (3) January 2012 (6) December 2011 (7) November 2011 (7) August 2011 (9) July 2011 (9) June 2011 (12) May 2011 (13) April 2011 (10) March 2011 (17) February cultipacker for sale 2011 (9) January 2011 (11) December 2010 (21) November 2010 (16) October 2010 (21) September 2010 (20) August 2010 (27) July 2010 (42) June 2010 (21) May 2010 (20) April 2010 (31) March 2010 (39) February 2010 (43) January 2010 (32) December 2009 (29) November 2009 (26) October 2009 (39) September 2009 (31) August 2009 (30) July 2009 (18) June 2009 (17) May 2009 (17) April 2009 (9) March 2009 (9) February 2009 (14) January cultipacker for sale 2009 (19) December 2008 (14) November 2008 (10) October 2008 (17) September 2008 (22) August 2008 (29) July 2008 (35) June 2008 (45) May 2008 (34) April 2008 (30) March 2008 (13) February 2008 (19) January 2008 (23) December 2007 (24) November 2007 (25) October 2007 (28) September 2007 (31) August 2007 (48) July 2007 (41) June 2007 (33) May 2007 (44) April 2007 (29) March 2007 (39) February 2007 (56) January 2007 (39) December 2006 (57) November 2006 (69) October 2006 (84) September 2006 (60) August 2006 (38) July 2006 (64) June 2006 (38) May 2006 (44) April 2006 (64) March 2006 (101) February cultipacker for sale 2006 (66) January 2006